<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Flip is fun, but no giant step for publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oov.no/undercurrent/2009/09/fast-flip-is-fun-but-no-giant-step-for-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oov.no/undercurrent/2009/09/fast-flip-is-fun-but-no-giant-step-for-publishers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:40:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Christian Oterhals</title>
		<link>http://www.oov.no/undercurrent/2009/09/fast-flip-is-fun-but-no-giant-step-for-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Christian Oterhals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oov.no/undercurrent/2009/09/fast-flip-is-fun-but-no-giant-step-for-publishers/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s interesting with Fastflip as a product, is it&#039;s apparent ability to learn from your selections.  Haven&#039;t seen that implemented well since the late Findory.com.

Times must be bad for US Publishers, though, if they think this is actually helps them financially and traffic wise.  I can&#039;t imagine that there will be much revenue to share on a site like this, if the ads are anything to judge by.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s interesting with Fastflip as a product, is it&#8217;s apparent ability to learn from your selections.  Haven&#8217;t seen that implemented well since the late Findory.com.</p>
<p>Times must be bad for US Publishers, though, if they think this is actually helps them financially and traffic wise.  I can&#8217;t imagine that there will be much revenue to share on a site like this, if the ads are anything to judge by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

