Archive for the ‘Media and democracy’ Category

Where do you get your news?

Saturday, December 27th, 2008

For Americans aged 18-29, the internet and TV are now just as important as main sources for national and international news, a Pew survey finds. 59 percent of respondents chose these alternatives, while 28 percent cited newspapers as most important news source. In Sept 2007, 34 percent chose the internet (tip: Spiegel Online).

Among all age groups, the internet has overtaken newspapers for the first time (see chart).

The rise of the Net is of course the big tendency here, but newspapers holding their own or even gaining since September 2007 is also interesting to note. See the full report (pdf).

479-1.gif

Related: A study of German web habits.

Also new from Pew: A future of the internet study among internet leaders, activists and analysts.

Writer/editor for Crimes of War website

Thursday, June 26th, 2008

This job opening might be interesting for some Undercurrent readers. I just received it via email, and thought it relevant to post it in its entirety here (extended entry). The Crimes of War book and website is an indispensable resource and deserves more attention. The writer/editor could be based in the UK or US and will be responsible for the day-to-day work on the website.

(more…)

Underanalyzed?

Monday, June 9th, 2008

Though the US presidential primaries have been covered more extensively than ever before in Europe — or so it seems, at least — the case can be made that important “campaign-technical” aspects have been less analyzed or commented on. This might have to do with the fascination of the duel between Obama and Clinton; a story that can be covered in the old-fashioned way, like a horserace. The connection described in the Slate video above between the Santos candidate in the West Wing series and Obama is entertaining stuff. But there are more substantial topics too tackle, as Martin Jönsson does by looking at the social media aspects (in Swedish). Some I have touched on also: Obama’s use of technology, his network’s fundraising and the “bittergate” story (in Norwegian).

2008 definitely is the first real web election, the first time we can really begin to appreciate how web-based services and behaviour is woven into society at so many levels. This doesn’t mean that all old-fashioned skills become obsolete — just look at the enduring importance of the political speech. To be continued!

Participation

Monday, May 26th, 2008

Another noteworthy Atlantic article on Obama, this time on his plans to use the web and technology in governing:

What Obama seems to promise is, at its outer limits, a participatory democracy in which the opportunities for participation have been radically expanded. He proposes creating a public, Google-like database of every federal dollar spent. He aims to post every piece of non-emergency legislation online for five days before he signs it so that Americans can comment. A White House blog-also with comments-would be a near certainty. Overseeing this new apparatus would be a chief technology officer.

See also:

Obama’s machine

All guns blazing

Monday, March 17th, 2008

The BBC is on to something very important with the season of programmes and debates called “White – is white working class Britain becoming invisible?”. Not only because of the topic, clearly important and controversial, and hence exactly the kind of material that public broadcasters should be concerned with. But also in the way it is done, as a series of originally produced documentaries on TV complemented with debate programmes also on TV and on the web, a website rich in material and also programmes from the archive on radio and TV. Using all the guns at its disposal simultaneously, a broadcaster can have an impact on society — dominate the public sphere, as it were — in a way that’s otherwise almost impossible in today’s fragmented society. Of course, that kind of power places a heavy responsibility on the producers. Here’s how they present “White”.

Accompanying the series is a fancy flash presentation of the debate. You have to click on the banner at the starting page to see it. Not sure if this really works in the context, but it looks good (tip: mymarkup.)

“Article Rescue Squadron”

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

Nicholson Baker’s The Charms of Wikipedia (actually a book review) is probably the best article on Wikipedia I have ever read; funny, enlightening and with numerous tips and ideas. Having contributed only sporadically to the encyclopedia myself, I wasn’t aware, for example, how fierce the deletion vs. inclusion battles have become. Phew.

Shortwave 0… web radio 1

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

An announcement from the BBC World Service: Shortwave transmissions of the radio service to Europe closed for good yesterday. Powerful images are triggered. Back in the 70s, the World Service and other radio transmitters over shortwave was the only broadcasting alternative available if you were tired of the one – 1 – radio channel and one – 1 – TV channel of the Norwegian state broadcaster. On World Service you could hear live commentary of English football matches on Saturdays and of midweek evening action. That is, if the weather permitted, often the noise made it quite hard to discern if Peter Lorimer had scored or missed the big opportunity. And then, on Saturdays at 6 PM local time, James Alexander Gordon presented the official — classified — football results. It was amazing to discover the other day that he is still doing this. Like the shortwave noise, hearing him pronouncing the team names and scores brings back the media world of the 70s. Tune in to the BBC on web radio next Saturday and experience a living media legend.

Transparent search?

Monday, January 7th, 2008

So Search Wikia in alpha version is up. Jimmy Wales is right in pointing out this: “I think it is unhealthy for the citizens of the world that so much of our information is controlled by such a small number of players, behind closed doors.” But will a transparent search engine work, is it possible? Will it be good enough? Exciting times ahead. Meanwhile, there will be tests and opinions. Techcrunch says it’s horrible. Interestingly, Wales replies in the comments, and defends himself well.

Test: German Wikipedia better than encyclopedia

Saturday, December 8th, 2007

German magazine Stern has tested the German language version of Wikipedia against the online version (for subscribers) of the encyclopedia Brockhaus. 50 random words were picked from a range of topics and a professional research agency evaluated the entries. Wikipedia came out on top in no less than 43 of the 50 words.

The whole 13-page (!) article is not online, but Wikipedistik (in German) has more details. The criteria were: accuracy (weight 40 percent), completeness (30), topicality/up to date (20), intelligibility/easy to understand (10). Out of this notes were constructed, and Wikipedia received on average 1,7, Brockhaus 2,7 (on a scale from 1 to 6 where 1 is best). (via the Wikimedia fundraising blog).

UPDATE after reading the whole article:

The only criteria where Brockhaus became a better note was for “Verständlichkeit” — i.e. how easy the text is to understand. That is of course a structural problem for Wikipedia that has been noted by many. Articles tend to suffer from a lack of editing. They are often too long, some aspects are described in too much detail, there is no real narrative flow. Theoretically this should improve over time. If it really is true that Wikipedia will run out of new topics, contributors could spend time on improving editing, adding references etc to existing articles. However, the big encouragement that (German) Wikipedians must bring with them from this test is that their articles got the excellent note 1,6 on accuracy (Brockhaus: 2,3). That really is impressive.

German broadcasters get Creative Commons

Monday, November 26th, 2007

cc5berlin.jpg

On December 14 Creative Commons celebrates five years already (parties in Berlin and San Francisco. So German public service broadcaster NDR has the timing right, last week they started an experiment that should be followed by many: they have Creative Commons-licensed material from two TV shows. Although the presentation isn’t as good as it could be, it’s exciting to read comments like this from a broadcasting director:

The content we provide on the web has been paid by our visitors via the licence fee already. Since we mainly reach a younger audience on the web, the use of a creative commons license is especially interesting for us.

(via Lessig blog).