Archive for the ‘Undercurrent in English’ Category

Twitter in 11506 characters

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

Evgeny Morozov delivers a good analysis, as usual, of the Twitter hype. Beware:

Twitter use in authoritarian countries comes with major drawbacks. Twitter creates an extensive online paper trail that can be easily used against dissidents. In fact, as Twitter use becomes more common, authoritarian governments are likely to exploit Twitter to gather open-source intelligence on the opposition — not a difficult task for anyone with an Internet hook-up. So Twitter could help authorities identify dissent at very early stages, tracking not just individual activists, but entire activist networks. An online friend list could enable a serious crack-down.

Will sprinkling pennies work?

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

New concepts for voluntary user payment — or more effective donations — keep turning up. The latest is Sprinklepenny (via Steve Outing). I’m intrigued by the possibilities, and I like this approach much better than the current “force the user to pay“-approach of the mainstream media. But will it work? Will there ever be enough users, so publishers will make more than, ah, pennies?

…and I think they really, really mean it

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Finally the media industry has come up with the ultimate plan that will reset the world again and save democracy: Make people pay $ 12.50 for quoting 5-25 of your precious words!:

Welcome to a world in which you won’t be able to effectively criticize the press, because you’ll be required to pay to quote as few as five words from what they publish.

Newspaper economy and innovation

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

Collected links from recent days:

Roy Greenslade: Some newspaper people more optimistic based on recent results. But if print revenue is improving, resources must be channeled into (online) innovation, not automatically hiring more reporters again, Greenslade and Earl Wilkinson say.

Guardian Media Group is losing money and reportedly considering to shut down The Observer.

New York Times CEO still thinking about models for charging readers.

Umair Haque follows up on his nichepaper manifesto. I’m still struggling with figuring out the basis for his niche optimism.

Future of Journalism: E-book and interviews published at OurBlook.

See my recent op-ed piece (in Norwegian) about journalism and innovation.

Niches and worried journalists

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

Strange: Everywhere I look there are stories, interviews and analyses about the future of journalism, crisis in the media etc, but I’m not getting fed up with it! A selection of the latest:

Michael Massing is upbeat about the news-producing potential of blogs in New York Review of Books.

Chris Anderson does some good fencing with Spiegel Online.

Umair Haque presents a “nichepaper manifesto”:

Nichepapers are the future of news because their economics are superior. All the Nichepapers above are “real” enterprises, with staff, offices, and fixed and variable costs. Nichepapers offer more bang for the buck: greater benefits for far less cost. Readers get more, better, and faster content – while publishers realize lower capital intensity, lower distribution, marketing, and production costs, and less risk. What is different about them is that they are finding new paths to growth, and rediscovering the lost art of profitability by awesomeness.

Afterthought: Are their economics really superior? How good are their numbers? What about examples from other countries?

Another good idea: The Investigations Fund

Friday, July 17th, 2009

Better than whining about Google: Experiment with new models for funding journalism. In the UK, an impressive line-up of people now launch The Investigations Fund. Roy Greenslade reports:

Its aim is to foster independent public interest journalistic inquiry while encouraging a new generation of reporters.

Related posts:

Pro Publica launched

What Google (and others) can do

Find those CC images

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

flickrcc.jpg

A few years ago Creative Commons licensing of photos (and other works) was mostly for geeks, but I believe use of the licenses are gaining in popularity, and slowly but surely, users will also credit photographers in the correct way. At least now that, finally, Google has launched Creative Commons filtering in their image search.

Still, so far I much prefer Peter Shanks’ flickrCC search site, which manages to combine usability with beauty — no small accomplishment. I can live with the limitation that here you “only” search through Flickr images.

And don’t forget: There’s also the Creative Commons own search page.

See more useful tools for bloggers and journalists and more about photography.

Teenybopper media analyst

Monday, July 13th, 2009

A 15 year old intern at Morgan Stanley in London wrote a report about how young people use the media — and the company thought it so excellent that it was published. (pdf). Matthew Robson’s report “generated five or six times more feedback than the team’s usual reports”, Morgan Stanley says. So is it any good? I don’t think people following media trends will find stunning new insights, though there might be important details there. The response should alert analysts to the merits of qualitative methodology. Above all, the report is written in clear language without all the meaningless buzzwords that usually are thrown around in such publications. If only consultants could learn that lesson, Matthew really deserves a prize!

Reuters handbook online

Monday, July 13th, 2009

Reuters has made its journalism handbook available online, free for everyone. Surely a very valuable resource for journalists, students, bloggers, writers all over the world. Dean Wright explains the reasoning behind the move in the following quote:

  • “Transparency: At a time when trust is an endangered commodity in the financial and media worlds, it’s important that news consumers see the guidelines our journalists follow.
  • Service: As we’ve seen over the past decade, the barriers to publishing have dropped so that anyone with an idea and a computer can be a publisher. But it’s also become clear that publishers have a varying standard of truth, fairness and style. Our handbook is a good place for budding journalists to begin.
  • Geography: Reuters serves a global audience and the handbook recognises the cultural and political differences that our journalists face in reporting for the world. This is a handbook not just for English-language journalists in the United Kingdom or the United States, but for wherever English is used.”

I found the news at the excellent journalism.co.uk. site, which also tips about one of the good Delicious features: The lists of popular bookmarks, here for the tag “journalism”, where the Reuters handbook currently is no. 1. A good tool.

Iran: We have hypernews, need cool analysis

Monday, June 15th, 2009

irantwit.jpg

Iran is moving fast, the best source for breaking news right now is Twitter, but don’t forget to be a brilliant analyst at the same time!:

There’s plenty of misinformation out there, like rumors that Ahmadinejad is going to stage an assassination attempt, so we need to be careful about how we judge the information. If we’re a savvy analyst, we need to be careful about the weight we attach to photographs and video accounts. They’re the most immediate and emotionally powerful, but they can distort our understanding of the situation, particularly of about the importance of specific developments.

Every major news story these days has its own user-driven information logic, Iran is no exception. The realtime criticism of CNN’s coverage is a good example. Now we debate the news judgement of the media as it happens, and this opinion exchange again influences the news coverage and maybe even events. Some news media have been good at reflecting this shift via their news blogs, a format that turns out to be very useful:

NYT/The Lede

Guardian News Blog

HuffPo

(Thanks to Etterretninger for alerting me of the story — late, while doing other things!).